Originally Posted by M a X

I just did a research paper on this and there's so many reasons why they are wrong. Here's a few

- Juvenile crime is the lowest its been in thirty years, the first video game came out 36 years ago

- JT said that violent school shootings wouldn't happen if it weren't for games like GTA but 2nd worst school shooting in history occurred in 1966

- Sure in GTA you can mow down pedestrians and cut police in half with chainsaws, but you can also choose not to. In games like Mario all you can do is save the princess, you can't rape her or kill her. So how are you supposed to be able to know what is good and what is bad if you don't have the option to do the bad thing. For you to learn the consequences of doing bad things don't you need to be able to do them?

I can post the whole paper if anyone wants me too, very interesting topic actually