Quote:
|
Originally Posted by duston Pierce who do you think you are? get over yourself. Spewing bs about the difference between facts and opinions. This isn't an english lesson, and it's so sad when people on forums have no real counter argument so they attack the other persons grammar. As for easier to get headshots, you're totally right. I mean when i put my br over someone head it sticks there like glue, but in pdz i actually have to aim. I can see exactly why you think halo is fairer.
Face it, regardless of how good halo is you can't escape how easy it is in comparison to pdz. I don't mind that you prefer halo but don't kid yourself that it takes more skill. |
Oh lord I'm so sorry masa. I was out of line masa, please don't beat me too hard. You always right masa, what was I thinking? Just put me in the shed for a few days again and I'll mend my ways masa.
Seriously though, who do you think YOU are? If you read the post before that one you will see that someone was telling me that what he said was a fact when it clearly was just his opinion and he had no sources to back up his "facts". I can't believe you said this, "it's so sad when people on forums have no real counter argument" and then your counter arguement was this, "I mean when i put my br over someone head it sticks there like glue, but in pdz i actually have to aim." There really isn't much autoaim in Halo 2 and it absolutlely does not make the game any easier when every player has it. Why don't you people understand that? This is your one counter argument, and it is wrong? Why don't you go back and read this thread because I have about one hundred and seventy five counter arguements and they actually make sense (well, most of them). I just can't get over this autoaim thing that people are stuck on. It's not like half the Halo 2 players have it and the other half don't. That would make it easier to aim for the people with autoaim, but when it is a part of the game (and a very small one) then it has nothing to do with how "easy" it is to aim because it is just as "easy" for someone to aim at you and kill you first. Console shooters add a tiny bit of autoaim in order to make up for the fact that you aren't using a mouse. I assume that Rare left it out because they made a headshot an instant kill and coupled with that autoaim would have made it too easy to kill each other and it would have been hard to stay alive for very long. If you are that upset about autoaim in Halo 2 try this, make a custom game with a friend and be on the same team. Fight each other. There will be no autoaim since you both are on the same team. You will hardly notice any difference because the autoaim in Halo 2 is so minimal. I play both games and I do not notice a huge difference in aiming. People that complain about autoaim are just like people that complain about the sword and the pp br combo, they just try to use that as an excuse because they get killed a lot. I wish I knew what your team slayer rank is because I bet mine is much higher and I don't complain about these things. I'm one of the players that kills you a lot and makes you come on here whining and crying about the sword and how easy it is because I stuck it in your head so many times. The sword is easy to use, because there are so many players like you who have no idea how to defend against it and so they get killed and complain about how bad the game is when really they just are not good at it. Anyway you said nothing about the multiplayer features of the two games and that is really what the arguemnet is here. Like I've said a thousand times before the gameplay of both games is fun. Halo 2 has better multiplayer. I've already explained why. If you think PDZ is a better game could you please explain to me why they left out so many features that make multiplayer fun?
Linear Mode
