*Wannys and Tippmans first dual COD2 montage Watch*

RmX WanNy · 07-01-2006

http://files.filefront.com/Wannys_an.../fileinfo.html
here it is lots of no scopes and good editing
and at there end random nades
ha yes its a must watch

Thepanzergnome · 12:57 PM

may as well download this then, not seen or played cod2 online yet.

dont have a clue whether the gameplay was good or not, im guessing it was average not sure tho, i already told you that the syncing could have been alot better, was on and off beat, but it was ok to watch i guess.

TuNice™ · 07-02-2006

Who cares I was in the credits for the first time ever. Now u need to make a halo montage so I can be killed by u. Im so Happy YEAAAAAAAAAAA

F3AR ChaRLie · 07-06-2006

Ok, first off never use filefront. Its slow and stupid and will cause you to get less downloads.

Now to review your montage.

I will give you some credit since not to many people make CoD 2 montages but i did not like it. You dident edit it well. You had some good no-scopes but thats basically all you had besides the nade kills at the end. You have to be able to mix it up. There where to many single clips instead of multi-kills. Which for this type of montage multi-clips would be the way to go.

Now if you want to see how a CoD 2 montage should be made check back here in about a month to see mine. I will show you whats a must watch.

Oh yea since FaTaL sucks bad at CoD 2 you should scrim us.

nightprinter · 07-06-2006

gameplay:1 (anyone can get some kills in this game. the fact that you have a capture card and record games, cut everything but the kills and throw it together and call it a must get montage is just hilarious!)
Edititing:1(The only editing I saw was slow motion. And they are just regular looking kills put in slow motion. I thought something had to look good to need to see it in slow motion?)
Overall: ....

FIF3 · 07-06-2006

Hmm, I missed this but I guess I can dl and edit tonight, for now, I gtg.

EDIT
BTW I really don't have a problem with filefront, never did, but I think they had a major update because it's much faster than what it use to be.

F3AR ChaRLie · 07-06-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by FifeTheSlayer

EDIT
BTW I really don't have a problem with filefront, never did, but I think they had a major update because it's much faster than what it use to be.

IDK man i had a fast D/L yesterday somehow as well. Usually i get like 7 kbs and i got like 170 kbs.

tehmenace · 07-06-2006

i'm gonna have to agree with charlie on this one. there were way too many everyday single kills. IMO the only good kills where the across map kills. editing was NOTHING special. there was no synching whatsoever that i could find. i'm not trying to flame you or anything, i'm just tryin to give u tips if u ever make a new one.

Skyllus vBi · 07-06-2006

You guys are being a bit harsh about it. How many of you have played CoD2 and tried those long no scopes? (Probably no-one, because we would have just scoped in, but still....)

Anyways, it was a DECENT montage but I still think it was better footage than the Type Z montage. However, there are a lot of gripes. You only used the sniper, no Garand clips or anything like that. And while using the sniper you were INTENTIONALLY not scoping to generate some footage. You were also playing with some of the noobiest people ever, who rarely looked in your direction for the kills. You should have just made that entire El Almein clip where you scored the first 10 kills on the noobs a full clip instead of editing it, instead speeding up parts. Random nades didn't require any skill at all, just some noobs who don't pay attention to the grenade indicators.

Pros

Some nice no scopes, albiet un-necessary.

Cons

Too many sniper clips
Obvious footage fishing
Noob enemies
Random nades wtf?

winterbacon · 07-06-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brutal Assassln

Random nades wtf?

I love random nades...